Large undertakings, such as infrastructure projects, inherently carry the risk of disputes. Ambiguous contract provisions, changes in market conditions, or implementation issues can lead to significant disruptions, budget overruns, and increased tensions between stakeholders. So, how can these risks be effectively managed? The answer lies in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods.
In a recent article published on the British Polish Chamber of Commerce website, our experts – Karol Macias and Adrian Andrychowski – delve into the practical aspects of implementing ADR in complex projects. You’ll learn why precise contractual clauses are crucial, the importance of an organization’s internal readiness to use ADR, and which tools to choose depending on the specifics of the dispute.
In the article, you will find answers to questions such as:
- Which specific details in contract clauses determine the effectiveness of mediation, arbitration, or dispute boards?
- How can an organization prepare for the effective use of ADR, and why does company culture matter?
- What are the pros and cons of various ADR methods (mediation, arbitration, dispute boards), and when should they be applied?
Our lawyers emphasize that ADR is not a magic fix, but a thoughtful approach to risk management that helps protect time, resources, and trust in complex undertakings. Instead of viewing disputes as failures, it’s worth treating them as opportunities to build stronger relationships and achieve better outcomes.
Want to learn how to make ADR a living part of your project management?
Read the full article on the British Polish Chamber of Commerce website.